Friday, May 14, 2010

If Sarah Palin is pro-life why then does she not have a problem hunting and killing animals from a helicopter?

Sounds rather hypocritical to me.If Sarah Palin is pro-life why then does she not have a problem hunting and killing animals from a helicopter?
I don't think pro-life has anything to do with hunting animals. She never said she was a member of PETA!If Sarah Palin is pro-life why then does she not have a problem hunting and killing animals from a helicopter?
My dad is a hunter, mostly on ducks. He loves many animals like he has guinea pigs and dogs and a cat. I am an animal activist. He is also a pro life and a pro adoption which he adopted me in 60's. I don't think its right for these animal activist to attack on the hunters. I don't attack on my dad, because of his hunting. I have told my dad on that issue of hunting issue- I disagree with him on hunting issue, since I do not hunt, but have done the fish scalding(salmon) collect the fishes after they dies the minute, and throw them away as a ranger. I don't like the idea of the way the forest rangers or naturalists deal with the ariel thing, I rather for spaying instead to control the overpopulation. You must understand the hunting always been a Traditional way of life that started with British/ Irish/ Russian ancestors. If we as animal activists ask nicely and ask Sarah palin to let her how we don't like the idea and disagree with the Wild life and Fish Game Dept from the Forest Services. ( hint: I worked for Forest Service as ranger in past and the ranger decides them and often influence many things on every governors and presidents).Get it?, but I witness that myself as how the forest rangers-biologists do. Sarah Palin would respond to it differently and would be able to tolerate with changing the idea. Attacking the person over the issue would not make any difference. Only to have the Animal activist group and the forest rangers and to have Sarah Palin get together to go over like a presidental debate form style like that.
Hmmm... Let's apply the ';logic'; of that question to Obama. If he is pro-spreading the wealth around, then why does he contribute only about 7% of his own wealth to charity... and it was actually only about 1% until he decided to run for President and knew people would look at that? (McCain has consistently donated about 17% of his wealth for years, BTW).





But getting back to Palin, sorry, but most sane people don't place animals on the same level as a human baby. Apparently, you don't see a difference... How weird.
Because she is a Fundamentalist Christian and they think that since humans are on the top of the food chain that plants and animals are here for humans to exploit. The Amish are like that too actually. How did the Amish get rich? Puppy Mills.





EDIT: Pro-life, pro-choice has to do with views on human abortions.





Thumbs down? You think I'm wrong? HA. Wow.
how sad, so far most of these people seem to not care about animals lol





and Pro choice has nothing to do with animals yet she's screaming that its alright to kill what isn't human.





someone on here said '; that's what animals where made for?';





to kill them?





well yeah but isn't that one of the 10 commandments?





that one shall not kill





i mean wtf is god really a murderer?





hmm no wonder we are heartless in that department we are what god is no?





lol
pro-life is meant for humans. many humans do not believe in killing other humans, however, animals are not humans.





therefore, it is not hypocritical in the least.
Is a gene, she said was her father that make her interesting in hunting, is father to daughter gene.





Also don't forgot Dick Cheney also like to hunt, except he suck.
Some people look at a child differently than a hamburger, a piece of chicken, an egg or other animal. It is sad some people like yourself can not see the difference between human life and animal life.






Pro-life deals with people not animals.


I'm a Vegetarian not because I like animals but because I hate plants.
Haha - because the wolves aren't pregnant. Just kidding. I agree. None of her stances make any sense. She just ends up looking hypocritical.
Because when she says she is pro life she means human life.





If we use your line of thinking then when vegetarians say the don't eat anything that is alive how can they eat vegetables or wear anything leather?
She was born out of a elephants stomach and forever have cursed at the animal kingdom for that, thus hating whatever animal comes her way.
I guess it's different when the animals not in the womb anymore.
This is called animal control. When you shoot dangerous animal from a helicopter.
She doesn't dry gulch three-quarter born babies. Now talk about killing animals.





Jeff, I wonder if you are a moron. 'Just wondering
Unless she's hunting people from a helicopter, those are unrelated concepts.
There is a difference between people and animals!
Pro-life is another way of saying anti-abortion.
it's not hypocrtical because most ppl don't view animals the same as humans. plus if you want to get picky about it...isn't it her choice?
maybe she values human life above animals, like the Bible says.
Pro-life refers to humans, not animals.
Gotta eat. It's better than killing babies. Right Barrack?
The Christian bible says that man shall have dominion over all the animals of the Earth.
Pro-life is pro HUMAN life.
That's not what pro-life means.
You compare an animal to a human baby? Wow.
pro-human-life
Human life
She is Pro -HUMAN life!



because it is sooooo much fun

No comments:

Post a Comment